Concept:Scientific laws are well-established universal facts that are factual, predictive, and unchanging based on repeated evidence. They cannot be changed or replaced after extensive research because they are already proven.
Explanation:- A scientific law describes a fundamental relationship in nature and is supported by extensive experimental evidence.
- It is universally observable, factual, and does not provide an explanation for why it happens; it simply states what happens.
- Once framed, a scientific law has no exceptions under the same conditions and is considered unchanging.
- Option A says a law can be changed or replaced after extensive research. This is incorrect because laws are already proven facts; they do not get altered later. New research may expand our understanding, but the law itself remains valid.
- Options B, C, and D correctly describe the nature of a scientific law: factual and predictive, universally observable, and lacking explanation or exceptions when first framed.
Answer:Option A is incorrect. Therefore, the incorrect statement is: A. A ‘Law’ in science can be changed or replaced after extensive research.