Concept:Discussions on government often become subjective, leading to extreme views. The teacher should encourage fact-based, balanced interactions rather than personal opinions.
Explanation:Avoiding the topic (Option A) keeps students ignorant, which is not helpful in a democracy. Criticising government (Option B) is biased and not the teacher’s role. Arguing for judicial activism (Option C) imposes a personal ideology, not objective learning. The correct approach is to organise objective interactions (Option D), where students exchange ideas based on facts, not personal views. This builds critical thinking, self‑confidence, and a balanced understanding of government. Small group discussions help develop the ability to debate, bring out past experiences, and reveal different viewpoints. The teacher must remain neutral and present genuine facts, regardless of personal beliefs. Objective interactions ensure students learn to discuss government functioning without falling into extreme or biased positions.
Answer:Option D: organise more objective interactions as compared to didactive views.