Exams Net
Unrestricted Exams Practice
Home
Exams
Banking
CUET
Defence
Engineering
Finance
GATE
Insurance
International
JEE
LAW
MBA
MCA
Medical
Other
Police
PSC
RRB
SSC
State Govt
Subjectwise
Teacher
SET Exams
UPSC
Aptitude
Algebra and Higher Mathematics
Arithmetic
Commercial Mathematics
Data Based Mathematics
Geometry and Mensuration
Number System and Numeracy
Problem Solving
Board Exams
Andhra
Bihar
CBSE
Gujarat
Haryana
ICSE
Jammu and Kashmir
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Odisha
Tamil Nadu
Telangana
Uttar Pradesh
English
Competitive English
CBSE
CBSE Class 10 Solutions
CBSE Class 12 Solutions
CBSE Question Papers (Pdf)
NCERT Books (Pdf)
NCERT Exemplar Books (Pdf)
NCERT Study Notes (Pdf)
CBSE Study Concepts (Pdf)
NCERT Text Book Class 11 Solutions
NCERT Text Book Class 12 Solutions
ICSE Class 10 Papers
Certifications
Technical
Cloud Tech Certifications
Security Tech Certifications
Management
IT Infrastructure
More
About
Contact Us
Our Apps
Privacy
+
-
Test Index
GMAT Verbal Reasoning Practice Test 7
Show Para
Hide Para
Share question:
© examsnet.com
Question : 13 of 100
Marks:
+1
,
-0
Any serious policy discussion about acceptable levels of risk in connection with explosions is not well served if the participants fail to use the word “explosion” and use the phrase “energetic disassembly” instead. In fact, the word “explosion” elicits desirable reactions, such as a heightened level of attention, whereas the substitute phrase does not. Therefore, of the two terms, “explosion” is the one that should be used throughout discussions of this sort.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?
In the kind of discussion at issue, the advantages of desirable reactions to the term “explosion” outweigh the drawbacks, if any, arising from undesirable reactions to that term.
The phrase “energetic disassembly” has not so far been used as a substitute for the word “explosion” in the kind of discussion at issue.
In any serious policy discussion, what is said by the participants is more important than how it is put into words.
The only reason that people would have for using “energetic disassembly” in place of “explosion” is to render impossible any serious policy discussion concerning explosions.
The phrase “energetic disassembly” is not necessarily out of place in describing a controlled rather than an accidental explosion.
Validate
Go to Question:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
Prev Question
Next Question