Concept:To decide whether the team will drop Sportec, we need a reason that directly favours Xpact over Sportec.
Explanation:Statement I: A change in management might change terms, but this implies they may still continue with Sportec. So it does not help Xpact.
Statement II: Sportec's losses do not directly affect the quality or validity of their contract with the team. So this is not in Xpact's favour.
Statement III: Sportec's conflict with neighboring countries is irrelevant to the team's contract decision. So this does not help Xpact.
Statement IV: Xpact provides new features that Sportec does not. This gives the team a clear reason to switch to Xpact.
Statement V: Being the only other manufacturer only makes Xpact available, but does not justify not renewing with Sportec.
Only Statement IV supports Xpact getting the contract.
Answer:Only IV, hence option A.