Show Para
Direction: In this section you have a passage. After the passage, you will find some items based on the passage. First, read the passage and answer the items based on it. You are required to select your answers based on the contents of the passage and opinion of the author only.
Passage I do not wish to suggest that because we were one nation we had no differences, but it is. Submitted that our leading men travelled throughout India either on foot or in-bullock-carts. They learned one another's languages and there was no aloofness among them. What do You think could have been the intention of those farseeing ancestors of ours who established Setubandha (Rameshwar) in the South, Jagannath in the East and Hardware the North as places of pilgrimage? You will admit they were no fools. They knew that worship of God could have been performed just as well at home. They taught us that those whose hearts Were aglow with righteousness had the Ganges in their own homes. But they saw that India was one undivided land so made by nature. They, therefore, argued that it must be one nation. Arguing thus, they established holy places in various parts of India, and fired the people with an idea of nationality in a manner unknown in other parts of the world. And we Indians are one as no two Englishmen are. Only you and I and others who consider ourselves civilized and superior persons imagine that we are many nations. It was after the advent of railways that we began to believe in distinctions, and you are at liberty now to say that it is through the railways that we are beginning to abolish those distinctions. Ail opium-eater may argue the advantage of opium-eating from the fact that began to understand the evil of the opium habit after r having eaten it. I would ask you to consider well what I had said on the railways
[NDA I 2019]
Go to Question: