RRB ALP CBT I 16 Feb 2026 Shift 2 Paper

Concept:This is a data sufficiency problem based on ordering heights.We must check if the given statements provide enough information to identify the tallest pole uniquely.Explanation:From statement (I), we know:$M > L > D$This gives an order among only $M$, $L$, and $D$.It gives no information about $I$ or $O$.Hence, statement (I) alone is not sufficient.From statement (II), we know:$I > D > O$This gives an order among only $I$, $D$, and $O$.It gives no information about $M$ or $L$.Hence, statement (II) alone is not sufficient.Combining both statements:From (I): $M > L > D$From (II): $I > D > O$We can only conclude that both $M$ and $I$ are taller than $D$, and $D$ is taller than $O$.However, there is no relationship given between $M$ and $I$, or between $L$ and $I$.Therefore, the tallest pole cannot be determined uniquely.Even after combining both statements, the data is insufficient.Answer:Data in both statements I and II together are not sufficient to answer the question.Correct option: A.