Concept:Syllogism conclusion follows only if it is definitely true in every possible case.
Explanation:Let
D = drinks,
F = food, and
E = eatables.
Statement 1 gives
D⊆F.
Statement 2 gives
E∩D=∅.
So eatables and drinks cannot overlap.
But eatables may or may not overlap food.
Thus
F∩Eî€ =∅ is not forced.
Conclusion I says some food are eatables, i.e.
F∩Eî€ =∅.
Conclusion II says some eatables are food, i.e.
E∩Fî€ =∅.
Both are possible, but neither is definite.
Hence neither conclusion follows.
Answer:Neither I nor II follows.