Concept:Behaviourist teaching focuses on stimulus-response associations and is best suited for lower-order learning tasks like memorization and drill.
Explanation:This question asks which statement is
not a valid criticism of the behaviourist model.
Behaviourism is often criticised for ignoring mental processes such as reasoning and problem-solving, so option A is a valid criticism.
It is also considered unsuitable for higher-order learning that requires critical thinking, making option B a valid criticism.
Option D points out that learning sometimes goes beyond simple stimulus-response links, which is another accepted flaw.
However, behaviourism is actually very effective for lower-order learning such as basic skill practice and repetition.
Therefore, claiming it is "not appropriate for lower-order learning" is incorrect — this statement is
not a genuine criticism.
Thus, the answer is the option that falsely accuses behaviourism of being ineffective where it is actually strong.
Answer:It is not appropriate for lower order learning. (Option C)