Concept:Use algebraic identities to simplify expressions, then analyze whether the given statements determine the relation between
m and
n.
Explanation:From Statement I:
m=(1−p)(p2+p+1)=1−p3 (using
a3−b3=(a−b)(a2+ab+b2)).
n=(p+1)(p2−p+1)=p3+1 (using
a3+b3=(a+b)(a2−ab+b2)).
Thus
m=1−p3 and
n=p3+1.
The value of
p can be any real number; for example, if
p=0, then
m=1 and
n=1 (so
m=n); if
p>0, then
n>m; if
p<0, then
m>n.
So Statement I alone is insufficient.
From Statement II:
m=pn. This gives
m/n=p, but
p can be any real number. Without knowing
p, we cannot decide if
m>n (e.g.,
p=2 gives
m>n,
p=0 gives
m=n,
p=−1 gives
m<n).
Thus Statement II alone is also insufficient.
Combining both: we have
m=1−p3,
n=p3+1, and
m=pn.
Substitute:
1−p3=p(p3+1)⟹1−p3=p4+p⟹p4+p+p3−1=0.
This equation has multiple real roots (e.g.,
p=1 gives
1+1+1−1=2î€ =0,
p=−1 gives
1−1−1−1=−2î€ =0,
p=0 gives
−1=0 false).
Even if we find a
p, the relation
m>n would depend on that specific
p, and not be uniquely determined for all real
p.
Therefore, even using both statements together, we cannot answer whether
m>n for all real numbers
m,n.
Answer:Option D – The question cannot be answered even by using both statements together.