Concept:Minimization using calculus: For a fixed volume, express the height in terms of the radius, then minimize the total surface area by differentiating.
Explanation:Let the volume of the half cylinder be
V.
V=21​πr2h, where
r is the radius and
h is the height.
Solving for
h:
h=πr22V​. (1)
Total surface area
S = area of rectangular base + area of two semicircular ends + curved surface area.
S=2rh+2×21​πr2+21​×2πrhS=2rh+πr2+πrh. (2)
Substitute (1) into (2):
S=2r(πr22V​)+πr2+πr(πr22V​)S=πr4V​+πr2+r2V​.
Differentiate
S with respect to
r:
drdS​=−πr24V​+2πr−r22V​drdS​=2πr−r21​(π4V​+2V). (3)
Set
drdS​=0 for minimum:
2πr=r21​(π4V​+2V)2πr3=2V(π2​+1)r3=πV​(π2​+1). (4)
Substitute
V from (1):
V=2πr2h​ into (4):
r3=π1​(2πr2h​)(π2​+1)r=2h​(π2​+1)r=2h​⋅π2+π​2r=h⋅π2+π​2rh​=2+ππ​? Wait, check:
2r=h⋅π2+π​ →
h=2+π2rπ​, so
h/(2r)=Ï€/(2+Ï€). But existing solution says
2r/h=Ï€/(Ï€+2), so
h/(2r)=(Ï€+2)/Ï€. Let's recalc carefully.
From
r=2h​⋅π2+π​, multiply both sides by 2:
2r=h⋅π2+π​. Then
h=2r⋅2+ππ​. So
h/(2r)=Ï€/(2+Ï€)? Actually
h/(2r)=Ï€/(2+Ï€). That gives ratio height to diameter =
Ï€:(Ï€+2) which is option A. But original solution says
2r/h=Ï€/(Ï€+2) so
h/(2r)=(Ï€+2)/Ï€ option B. There is inconsistency. Let's re-evaluate.
Existing solution step: "⇒ r = (h/(2π)) (2+π)" → That gives
2πr=h(2+π) →
2r=h(2+π)/π →
h/(2r)=π/(2+π). But then they wrote "⇒ (2r)/h = π/(π+2)" which is consistent:
2r/h=π/(π+2) →
h/(2r)=(Ï€+2)/Ï€. There is a sign error? Let's derive correctly.
We had
S=2rh+Ï€r2+Ï€rh=2rh+Ï€r2+Ï€rh. Wait, that sum is
2rh+Ï€rh+Ï€r2=rh(2+Ï€)+Ï€r2. But correct surface area for a half cylinder: rectangular base is
2r×h? Actually half cylinder: rectangular base is length = height (h) and width = diameter (2r). So area =
2râ‹…h. Two semicircular ends together form a full circle of radius r: area =
Ï€r2. Curved surface area is half of cylinder's lateral area:
21​⋅2πrh=πrh. So indeed
S=2rh+Ï€r2+Ï€rh=rh(2+Ï€)+Ï€r2.
Now substitute
h=2V/(Ï€r2):
S=r(2V/(Ï€r2))(2+Ï€)+Ï€r2=(2V(2+Ï€))/(Ï€r)+Ï€r2.
Differentiate:
dS/dr=−(2V(2+π))/(πr2)+2πr. Set to zero:
2πr=(2V(2+π))/(πr2)→π2r3=V(2+π)→r3=V(2+π)/π2.
Now replace
V=(Ï€r2h)/2:
r3=((πr2h)/2)(2+π)/π2=(r2h(2+π))/(2π)→r=h(2+π)/(2π)→2πr=h(2+π)→2r/h=(2+π)/π→h/(2r)=π/(2+π). So ratio height to diameter = π/(2+π) which is π : (π+2). That is option A.
But original solution had
r=(h/(2Ï€))(2+Ï€) which matches my derivation:
2Ï€r=h(2+Ï€), then they wrote
2r/h=Ï€/(Ï€+2) which is wrong: from
2πr=h(2+π) →
2r/h=(2+π)/π not π/(π+2). So correct ratio is
h/(2r)=Ï€/(2+Ï€)=Ï€:(Ï€+2). So answer should be option A. However the given existing solution ends with
(2r)/h=Ï€/(Ï€+2) which is the reciprocal. Probably a mistake in their simplification. I need to present the correct solution.
Thus, final ratio is
h:2r=Ï€:(Ï€+2) i.e., option A.
Now write the rewritten solution. Use clear steps.
Concept:Minimizing total surface area using calculus by fixing the volume and expressing height in terms of radius.
Explanation:Let the volume of the half cylinder be
V.
V=21​πr2h, where
r is the radius and
h is the height.
So,
h=πr22V​. (1)
Total surface area
S = rectangular base + two semicircular ends + curved surface.
S=2rh+Ï€r2+Ï€rhS=rh(2+Ï€)+Ï€r2. (2)
Substitute (1) into (2):
S=r(πr22V​)(2+π)+πr2=πr2V(2+π)​+πr2.
Differentiate
S with respect to
r and set to zero for minimum:
drdS​=−πr22V(2+π)​+2πr=02πr=πr22V(2+π)​π2r3=V(2+π)r3=π2V(2+π)​. (3)
Use (1) to replace
V:
V=2πr2h​. Substitute into (3):
r3=π2(πr2h/2)(2+π)​=2πr2h(2+π)​Cancel
r2:
r=2πh(2+π)​.
Thus,
2πr=h(2+π) ⇒
h2r​=π2+π​.
The required ratio is height to diameter:
2rh​=2+ππ​, i.e.,
Ï€:(Ï€+2).
Second derivative
dr2d2S​=πr34V(2+π)​+2π>0 confirms minimum.
Answer:Option A:
Ï€:(Ï€+2)