The statement asks to contemplate over gender-specific practices and rules observed in the temples of India. Argument I suggests that since our forefathers believed in such customs it should be practiced and adopted as a status quo. This seems illogical, as we must evolve and progress, many old practices like Sati, child marriage etc.have been abolished. Therefore, argument I is not strong. Argument II suggests that the social norms of the 21st century should promise gender equality in every field including matters concerning religion. This is a constitutional right. Therefore, argument II is strong. Hence, option 3 is correct.