The statement asks whether India should adopt a one-child policy. Argument I supports the claim and states that India must do it because other developed nations have done this. This is illogical, we cannot just follow the footsteps of others without having a defined objective. Therefore, argument I is not strong. Argument II dismisses the claim and suggests that by doing so we intervene in the laws of nature and God. This argument is illogical and does not justify the statement. Therefore, argument II is not strong. Hence, option 1 is correct.