Examsnet
Unconfined exams practice
Home
Exams
Banking Entrance Exams
CUET Exam Papers
Defence Exams
Engineering Exams
Finance Entrance Exams
GATE Exam Practice
Insurance Exams
International Exams
JEE Exams
LAW Entrance Exams
MBA Entrance Exams
MCA Entrance Exams
Medical Entrance Exams
Other Entrance Exams
Police Exams
Public Service Commission (PSC)
RRB Entrance Exams
SSC Exams
State Govt Exams
Subjectwise Practice
Teacher Exams
SET Exams(State Eligibility Test)
UPSC Entrance Exams
Aptitude
Algebra and Higher Mathematics
Arithmetic
Commercial Mathematics
Data Based Mathematics
Geometry and Mensuration
Number System and Numeracy
Problem Solving
Board Exams
Andhra
Bihar
CBSE
Gujarat
Haryana
ICSE
Jammu and Kashmir
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Odisha
Tamil Nadu
Telangana
Uttar Pradesh
English
Competitive English
Certifications
Technical
Cloud Tech Certifications
Security Tech Certifications
Management
IT Infrastructure
More
About
Careers
Contact Us
Our Apps
Privacy
Test Index
Xavier Aptitude Test 2017 Solved Paper
Show Para
Hide Para
Share question:
© examsnet.com
Question : 27
Total: 97
Analyse the following caselet and answer the question that follows:
Genius Consulting is a boutique consulting firm started by Shirish, Balram, Rahman and Xavier, four friends from a pre- mier business school. They committed themselves to abide by two principles: a) not to indulge in anything unethical and b) share earnings equally.
Genius Consulting could not get a significant project till the following year, when they managed a big one after Rahman’s father referred their firm to his top management. Convinced of the team’s talent following an impressive presentation,
the top management awarded them the project even though six other referred teams made presentations. The day following the presentation, they met to decide the way forward for the organization. Which of the following choices would be the most appropriate for Genius Consulting?
As this project violates both their principles, Genius consulting should not take up the project.
Due to the violation of the first principle Genius con suiting should not take up this project. EBD 7421 XAT-2017
They should take up the project. Further, since Rahman had agreed to equal sharing, he is not entitled to finder’s fee.
They should take up the project and as the referral helped them survive, Rahman should be paid finder’s fee.
They should take up the project. But, in order not to violate the principles, Rahman can be paid finder’s fee this year and an equal amount be deducted from his compensation the next year.
Validate
Solution:
(d) Referring may not be considered as unethical. Further, Rahman should be paid his fee. Therefore, option (d) is the best choice.
© examsnet.com
Go to Question:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
Prev Question
Next Question