Test Index

CLAT LLM 2012 Question Paper with answer key for online practice

© examsnet.com

Question : 52

Total: 100

‘Y’ enters into a bet with ‘Z’, ‘Y’ promises that he will pay Rs. 50.000/- to, ‘Z’ if Australia defeats India in a one day international being played at Delhi. ‘Z’ in turn promises to pay Rs. 50.000/- to ‘Y’ if India defeats Australia. India defeats Australia and ‘Z’ instead of paying the amount to ‘Y’ executes a promissory note in favour of ‘Y’, promising that he will pay money on or before a specified date. No witness attests the promissory note. The promissory note is not registered, ‘Z’ fails to pay within the stipulated time. On the basis of the above mentioned facts, which one of the following is the correct answer as per the Indian law?

The promissory note has no validity in the eye of law because it is not attested
The promissory note has no validity in the eye of law because it is not registered
The promissory note has no validity in the eye of law because it is for debt due on wagering contract
The promissory note has no validity in the eye of law because betting should involve only cash transactions

Go to Question:

Prev Question

Next Question

More Free Exams: