A report on the use of monosodium glutamate in food concluded, “Most Americans who consume monosodium glutamate regularly are not being harmed.” Critics of the report insist the conclusion be changed to, “Most Americans who
consume monosodium glutamate do not show visible symptoms of harm by the substance, such as abnormal rashes or slower rates of metabolism.”
Which of the following, if true, provides the best logical justification for the critics’ insistence that the report’s conclusion be changed?

Question

Examsnet · Accepted Answer

Correct Answer is :  Monosodium glutamate could be causing long term damage for which symptoms have not yet become visible.

GMAT Verbal Reasoning Practice Test 1