The statement mentions that students during the home exams at times are not able to manage passing marks. The course of action I suggests such cases should be identified and retests should be conducted for them. Exams are not punishment, neither do they evaluate the worth of a student they just assess progress. So if a student lags behind marginally he may be given another chance. Therefore, the course of action I follow. The course of action II suggests that minimum passing marks should be brought down after revision so that each student manages to pass comfortably. This devalues the process and defeats the purpose of conducting the examination. Therefore, the course of action II does not follow. Hence, Only I follows.