Concept:For statement I, the equality of bond lengths depends on molecular geometry and symmetry of the central atom's bonds.
For statement II, bond order is calculated from molecular orbital theory as
2Nb−Na.
Explanation:Statement I:BF4−: Central B has 4 bond pairs and 0 lone pairs => tetrahedral geometry.
All four
B−F bonds are equivalent => equal bond lengths.
SiF4: Central Si has 4 bond pairs and 0 lone pairs => tetrahedral.
All four
Si−F bonds are equivalent => equal bond lengths.
XeF4: Central Xe has 4 bond pairs and 2 lone pairs => square planar.
All four
Xe−F bonds are equivalent by symmetry => equal bond lengths.
SF4: Central S has 4 bond pairs and 1 lone pair => see-saw shape.
There are two axial and two equatorial
S−F bonds, which are not equivalent; axial bonds are longer.
=> Unequal bond lengths.
Thus only one species (
SF4) has unequal bond lengths, not two.
Hence statement I is false.
Statement II:Using molecular orbital theory:
O2+: bond order = 2.5;
O2: bond order = 2;
O2−: bond order = 1.5;
O22−: bond order = 1;
F2: bond order = 1.
Among
O2−,
O22−,
F2,
O2+, the highest bond order is 2.5 for
O2+, not
O2−.
Hence statement II is false.
Both statements are false.
Answer:Option A: Both Statement I and Statement II are false.