Examsnet
Unconfined exams practice
Home
Exams
Banking Entrance Exams
CUET Exam Papers
Defence Exams
Engineering Exams
Finance Entrance Exams
GATE Exam Practice
Insurance Exams
International Exams
JEE Exams
LAW Entrance Exams
MBA Entrance Exams
MCA Entrance Exams
Medical Entrance Exams
Other Entrance Exams
Police Exams
Public Service Commission (PSC)
RRB Entrance Exams
SSC Exams
State Govt Exams
Subjectwise Practice
Teacher Exams
SET Exams(State Eligibility Test)
UPSC Entrance Exams
Aptitude
Algebra and Higher Mathematics
Arithmetic
Commercial Mathematics
Data Based Mathematics
Geometry and Mensuration
Number System and Numeracy
Problem Solving
Board Exams
Andhra
Bihar
CBSE
Gujarat
Haryana
ICSE
Jammu and Kashmir
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Odisha
Tamil Nadu
Telangana
Uttar Pradesh
English
Competitive English
Certifications
Technical
Cloud Tech Certifications
Security Tech Certifications
Management
IT Infrastructure
More
About
Careers
Contact Us
Our Apps
Privacy
Test Index
LSAT India Practice Test 2 Section 3 with answers for free online practice
Show Para
Hide Para
Share question:
© examsnet.com
Question : 3
Total: 26
Champa: The artist Marc Quinn has displayed, behind a glass plate, biologically replicated fragments of Sir John Sulston’s DNA, calling it a “conceptual portrait” of Sulston. But to be a portrait, something must bear a recognizable resemblance to its subject.
Anil: I disagree. Quinn’s conceptual portrait is a maximally realistic portrait, for it holds actual instructions according to which Sulston was created.
The dialogue provides most support for the claim that Champa and Anil disagree over whether the object described by Quinn as a conceptual portrait of Sir John Sulston
should be considered to be art
should be considered to be Quinn’s work
bears a recognizable resemblance to Sulston
is actually a portrait of Sulston
Validate
Solution:
© examsnet.com
Go to Question:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Prev Question
Next Question